Issue 56 - 6.7 HP CR - 6.7 HPCR Engine Meets 2010 Emissions



Back Issue Index

 
  MAGAZINE
Purpose  
Sample Articles  
Magazine Index  
Subscribe/Renew  
Request Free Issue  
Gift Subscription  
Buy Back Issues  
Buy TDR Logo Items  
Advertising  
TDR Advertisers  
Membership Drive  

 
  ARTICLE CATEGORIES
 

News Archive

 
Search  


Advanced Search
 

 
Already a member?

Login here:
Username:
Password:
 

 

 »  Home  »  Technical Information  »  Issue 56 - 6.7 HP CR - 6.7 HPCR Engine Meets 2010 Emissions
Issue 56 - 6.7 HP CR - 6.7 HPCR Engine Meets 2010 Emissions
By Robert Patton | Published  06/3/2007 | Technical Information | Rating:
Robert Patton
Editor, Turbo Diesel Register 

View all articles by Robert Patton
6.7 HPCR Engine Meets 2010 Emissions

It has been a full year since the March '05 announcement of the Dodge 3500 Chassis Cab with the 6.7 liter Cummins engine. The 3500 Chassis Cabs rolled off the assembly line last fall and we introduced this column in the magazine to cover developments with the 6.7 HCPR engine.

At the Chicago Auto Show in February Dodge announced their new 4500 and 5500 Chassis Cab that use the same 6.7 HPCR engine. Hand-in-hand was the '07.5 model year introduction of the 6.7 HPCR engine in the 2500 and 3500 pickup trucks.

Somewhat lost in the flurry of announcements, introductions and hardware hitting the streets was the following press release from Cummins.

"In January Cummins Inc. unveiled the strongest, cleanest, quietest best-in-class 2007 6.7-liter Turbo Diesel engine, used exclusively in Dodge Ram 2500 and 3500 Heavy Duty pickup trucks. The engine has increased displacement providing increased horsepower and torque while achieving the world's lowest 2010 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) NOx standard a full three years ahead of the requirements.

"Cummins is the first diesel engine manufacturer to have a product certified to the 2010 EPA heavy-duty engine standards for oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) emissions, making it the cleanest heavy-duty diesel engine available in North America. The 2010 EPA standards for NOx (0.2g) and PM (0.01g) represent a more than 90 percent reduction in each pollutant, compared to the 2004 standards.

"'The application of the right technology on the Dodge Ram is an extension of the joint clean diesel development work Cummins and DaimlerChrysler have performed together for nearly two decades,' said Cummins President and Chief Operating Officer Joe Loughrey. 'The new best-in-class Cummins Turbo Diesel and the Dodge Ram will provide the strongest, cleanest, quietest solution for heavy-duty pickup truck customers.'

"'This new technology is a significant validation of the industry's ability to meet the EPA's 2010 clean diesel standards. These innovations help power our economy and drive our environmental successes,' said Bill Wehrum, EPA's Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation."

Cummins, in conjunction with DaimlerChrysler and the EPA, made this announcement prior to the Washington DC Auto Show in January.

When I first read the press release my reaction was, "Ho, hum, another beat-the-chest exercise by the PR folks." Is your reaction the same?

Look at the release again. It is important to note that with the 6.7 HPCR engine Cummins is the first diesel engine manufacturer to meet the 2010 EPA standards. This is big news!

Let's say it again, the 6.7 HPCR engine meets the 2010 EPA standards.

So, unlike the yo-yo changes that we have had to endure every 3 to 4 years, the '07 HPCR will be good until the next set of emissions legislation in 2013.

Will Ford be able to offer an engine package like this?

Will GM be able to offer an engine package like this?

Additionally, consider that the 2010 6.7 HPCR engine offers a solid engine platform that allows Dodge to engineer the next generation Ram, thus keeping the Dodge/Cummins relationship stable.

2010 Technology

This is big news. So much so that the February '07 issue of Diesel Progress (a trade-only publication, not to be confused with the plethora of newsstand "glossy" publications) devoted five pages to the 6.7 HPCR and its technology. The following are excerpts from the Diesel Progress article by Mike Brezonick as he talks with several of the Cummins Inc. personnel behind the 6.7 HPCR project.

"When Dodge and Cummins announced the 2007 engine months ago, both companies highlighted some of the notable and apparent changes. Yet both companies kept very quiet on what is in some ways the most noteworthy aspect of all, choosing to save that for a more appropriate stage.

"That stage turned out to be the Washington Automobile Show in January. Cummins took the wraps off emissions technology that is being used on the 2007 model year Ram 2500 and 3500 Heavy Duty pickup trucks. The system, which Dodge and Cummins said will meet EPA's emissions regulations for the next six years, is unprecedented in its sophistication and includes what is considered to be the first commercially produced NOx adsorber system to be used on a production vehicle in any market segment in North America.

The Challenge and Relationships

"'As we looked ahead to '07, Dodge's challenge to us was to stay up with the competition in the horsepower and torque wars,' said Jeff Caldwell, Cummins executive director – DaimlerChrysler Business. 'Our challenge was how do we do that and meet emissions?

"'Beyond cooled EGR and variable geometry turbos we knew we were going to add aftertreatment and if we took the same path that everyone else was taking, it would drive some pretty significant changes to the cooling system. You've seen that in the 2007/2008 model year trucks from Dodge's competition—they're wider and taller. They've changed the trucks.

"'We feel terrifically about our relationship with DaimlerChrysler,' said Joe Loughrey, Cummins' president and chief operating officer. 'And the decision to use this particular recipe to meet the 2010 standards in 2007 was a collective decision between Cummins and DaimlerChrysler after having reviewed more than one alternative as to what our approach might be.

"'I have to emphasize that this was not Cummins walking in to say, hey, here's the deal. It was us working very closely with DaimlerChrysler and our partners and determining this was the best by far course of action to make the best truck for customers and the cleanest truck you can find anywhere in America.'

The Technologies

"Clearly, the most head-turning part of the vehicle is the addition of the NOx adsorber to the aftertreatment system. For the better part of a decade, NOx adsorbers have been cited as a promising technology for controlling NOx emissions from diesel engines—indeed, they were specifically cited as key technology by EPA in its rulemaking.

"A NOx adsorber resembles a conventional catalyst, incorporating a catalytic substrate through which diesel exhaust is directed. Then the NOx molecules are collected and held—"adsorbed"—onto the surface of the substrate, removing them from the exhaust stream. When the surface area of the substrate is full, the adsorber is regenerated with heat used to chemically change the NOx into more benign gases, mostly nitrogen and oxygen.

"However, for all their potential in principle and in the lab, NOx adsorbers remained closer to a promise than a real product. More on the NOx adsorber in a minute.

"Cummins incorporated a range of technologies into the engine. A variable geometry turbocharger from Cummins Turbo Technologies contributes to improved engine breathing. And, because of the robustness of the sliding vane design, it also can be used to provide engine braking, a beneficial feature, particularly in towing applications.

"Other changes to the engine include an intake throttle between the engine and charge-air cooler and a bypass valve in the EGR circuit that allows the gas flow to bypass the EGR cooler entirely in some operating conditions. This allows for more precise control of EGR rates, faster engine and vehicle warm-up and can also assist in raising exhaust temperatures for aftertreatment regeneration.

"The engine also has a closed crankcase ventilation system developed by Cummins filtration. The system incorporates a coalescing filter that captures oil mist and returns it to the crankcase. The filter requires service after approximately 60,000 miles.

The Aftertreatment System

"The Aftertreatment system is a three-section unit that is packaged mostly under the vehicle floor. It begins with a close-coupled catalyst—essentially a conventional diesel oxidation catalyst incorporating a metallic substrate—mounted to a short downpipe just off the back of the turbocharger. Shortly behind and below the close-coupled catalyst is the NOx adsorber unit, which is followed by a particulate filter. Both the NOx adsorber and PM filter use ceramic substrates.

"All three aftertreatment sections have their own active regeneration schedules, and the engine ECM controls the regeneration cycles. Even more significant, despite the use of fuel for regeneration, the overall fuel economy for the vehicle is virtually unchanged from the 2006 trucks, Cummins said.

"The NOx adsorber is regenerated every few minutes at approximately 600° to 800°F and the process takes about three to five seconds. The NOx adsorber will also, over time, absorb sulfur from the fuel, which can reduce its effectiveness over time. So depending on how much fuel is burned—typically every two tankfuls, a separate regeneration cycle is initiated to remove the sulfur. The PM filter is regenerated when mass flow sensors in the exhaust system detect a specified amount of loading on the substrate, typically about every four operating hours. Unlike the PM filter systems used on heavy-duty applications, there is no ash cleaning required, and the PM filter—like the NOx adsorber and close-coupled catalyst—is rated for the life of the vehicle.

"In another departure from the heavy-duty side, all of the hydrocarbon dosing (diesel fuel) needed to raise the temperature for the various aftertreatment regenerations is handled by the fuel injection system rather than a separate injection system.

"'It took some time and a lot of work to integrate the control system,' said Jim Fier, technical project leader. 'Some of the fuel we use to light the catalyst is partially burned, and any time you burn fuel, you produce power. If we didn't you would feel that extra fuel as power. With both the air handling and the fueling, we had to adjust those various pulses in order to keep the power balance and the torque balance as we go in and do the regenerations.'

"Cummins engineered the entire aftertreatment system down to specifying the washcoat on the catalyst bricks, and the system was assembled by Tenneco, which does aftertreatment system packaging for many segments of DaimlerChrysler."

At the onset I noted that the news about 2010 emissions and the 6.7 HPCR engine was noteworthy. The Diesel Progress article excerpts give us a better understanding of the technology behind the engine. Go forth and be proud of the Dodge/Cummins truck that you own.

How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent


Your NameYour Email
Your Comment:
Verification:
Enter the security code shown below:
img0img1img2img3img4img5


Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by Ed Tabor)
    Rating
    Informative
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by R Winslow)
    Rating
    Very good excerpt
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Greg Adams)
    Rating
    Well written, informative article.
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by John Craig)
    Rating
    good info. helps to dispel bad rumours.
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by Joe Plumberg)
    Rating
    very interesting
     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by David Mathes)
    Rating
    We need more technical articles like this. Thanks,
     
  • Comment #7 (Posted by Hugh)
    Rating
    As a prospective buyer, I am trying to get unbiased tech evaluation on this new engine. This is the first place I have found it
     
  • Comment #8 (Posted by Cecil)
    Rating
    Very good information. Nice to know how your truck works.
     
  • Comment #9 (Posted by Bob Fulton)
    Rating
    Good article.
     
  • Comment #10 (Posted by k kraemer)
    Rating
    As the owner of a new 6.7, I'd like to know more-good or bad.
     
  • Comment #11 (Posted by J. Morse)
    Rating
    Good info.Answers a few questions I've seen posted in the forums.
     
  • Comment #12 (Posted by Tim Quast)
    Rating
    Very good article, it was very informing on how the after treatments work.
     
  • Comment #13 (Posted by Bill)
    Rating
    Very well written article on the various components used to meet the 2010 emission standards.
     
  • Comment #14 (Posted by Thomas Petrik)
    Rating
    I have a 2007 6.7 cummins and it didn't last a 1000 miles before the particulate filter plugged stalled the truck.I hope no damage was done and was wondering if anyone else has heard of similar problems.
     
  • Comment #15 (Posted by G SCHOELLER)
    Rating
    good info on the operation of the new 6.7
     
  • Comment #16 (Posted by JOE DAVENPORT)
    Rating
    I have buddies that say the 6.7 is not going to meet the EPA requirements. I pull a travel trailer & I am considering going to the 6.7. Is there going to be major problems with this engine? I have a 2003 cummins now & I love it. Thanks for your time. Joe D.
     
  • Comment #17 (Posted by Thomas D. Potter)
    Rating
    Excellent, very informative, and exiting. Made copies for my friends.
     
  • Comment #18 (Posted by warren jolley)
    Rating
    great
     
  • Comment #19 (Posted by Dennis)
    Rating
    good article, I have a better understanding of the new 6.7
     
  • Comment #20 (Posted by John Pauley)
    Rating
    Getting ready to purchase a 2007 with a 6.7 and want to know what the diffence is over the 5.9. Looking for milage results and anything else I can find out.
     
  • Comment #21 (Posted by Gifford Rodine)
    Rating
    Thanks. Diesel technology offers a lot of potential benefit, this indicates there are quality minds working on it.
     
  • Comment #22 (Posted by Gary Morency)
    Rating
    Excellent now have a much better understanding of how system works
     
  • Comment #23 (Posted by sid benge)
    Rating

    very good information. I just bought 2500 with new engine. will kep track with you
     
  • Comment #24 (Posted by Ken Sossong)
    Rating
    I have the new engine in my RAM 3500. Having MAJOR issues w/ the engine due to the lack of availability of the Ultra Low Sulfur Fuel. Turbocharger, Particulate Trap and Catalytic Converter are being replaced. Chrysler has said they will cover cost but dealer thinks they will. Anybody else having problems?
     
  • Comment #25 (Posted by Bob)
    Rating
    Great details on the NOx aftertreatment.
     
  • Comment #26 (Posted by Rene Ramirez)
    Rating
    I have had the 6.7 for three months and been in shop twice because of dpf being clogged up. I run the ultra low sulfur diesel always and still having problems.
     
  • Comment #27 (Posted by rene alanis)
    Rating
    This article is totally incorrect . My friend own 2 late model 3500 quad cab daully's 4x4 and were average 12 miles to the gallons and that not hauling anything . To state that the 06 and 07 get just about the same fuel milage is totally incorrect !
     
  • Comment #28 (Posted by BEN MICHEL)
    Rating
    I hope the thang they do is only rase horse power. stay A head of ford chv.
     
  • Comment #29 (Posted by Winston)
    Rating
    Lot's of power but poor mileage. I pull a 10k horse tlr LQ. I have a 3500 quad cab with 6 speed auto with SRT.
     
  • Comment #30 (Posted by Patrick Christenbury)
    Rating
    I have owned a 1993, a 2002, a 2004 H.O. and now a 2007 w/ 6.7litre. The new engine is causing major problems. ULSD fuel (15PPM) is not readily available everywhere. There is a recall for a module that allows allows the oxygen sensor to be compatible with the new fuel. I've had check engine lights twice but the new module under recall solved the issue. The new engine doesn't seem to be very powerful. My 04 5.9.litre H.O. was much stronger and got better mileage (24 m.p.g.) All my trucks have been 2500 SRW 2wd w/ 5 or 6 spd manuals. The new 6.7litre is only getting 18.5 m.p.g. Anyone getting better than this? Anyone feel like the new engine is weak?
     
  • Comment #31 (Posted by John Eckler)
    Rating
    Very Very Informative.....
     
  • Comment #32 (Posted by Bill Laakkonen)
    Rating
    Tremendous improvement over my 2004 3500 Dually. I, also, get better fuel economy with the 5.9 2007 2500 4X4. I, often, wonder what the 6.9 engine would be like as far as power, acceleration and fuel economy would be
    compared to the 5.9.
    Keep it up, Guys! You're doing a great job!
     
  • Comment #33 (Posted by Andy Carter)
    Rating
    I have a new 6.7 crew cab 3500 4x4 stick shift with 22,980 miles and not a problem yet. No codes, plugged smog equip or anything else. Drive 124 miles one way to work,average 80mph on freeway getting 14.5 to 15.7 mpg.I will never own a ford diesel again.
     
  • Comment #34 (Posted by Charlie Stout)
    Rating
    A well written and informative article. I do wonder, based on other so called "real life" reports, about the fuel economy claimed by Cummins.
     
  • Comment #35 (Posted by SCOTT YOUNGBLOOD)
    Rating
    THE 6.7 HAS TO MUCH EXAUST RESTRICTION IN MY OPINION. THEY DON'T SEEM TO HAVE THE POWER AS THE 5.9,AND THEY DON'T GET THE FUEL ECONOMY EITHER. I DON'T SEE HOW A TRUCK THAT GET'S 14 MPG PUTS OFF LESS EMISSIONS THAN ONE THAT GET'S 22 MPG.
     
  • Comment #36 (Posted by pete)
    Rating
    to much junk on the motor uses about double the fuel than the 5.9
     
  • Comment #37 (Posted by Brian southwick)
    Rating
    Great article I love my new dodge and the power quietness and the exhaust in not nearly as bad as my 03 quad cab.
     
  • Comment #38 (Posted by Robert O'Brien)
    Rating
    This answered my questions regarding the regen cycle. Thanks
     
  • Comment #39 (Posted by Brian)
    Rating
    Excellent article.
     
  • Comment #40 (Posted by Brian)
    Rating
    I don't drive a lot, so I'm worried that my new 6.7 will not be the right truck for me. I have already had check engine lites twice. The dealer flashed my computer with a new load that will allow the regen to happen sooner. I really like the truck, I'm just hoping it will work for me!
     
  • Comment #41 (Posted by Dan)
    Rating
    Hi I just purchase a 08 ram 2500 with the 6.7 it only has 200 miles on it so far i love it i have not towed with it yet but i will soon. I was very happy with the 03 ram with the 5.9ho that i purchase new in 04. You can`t beat cummins. I would love a cummins baseball cap Black with white letters let me know where i can buy one . Great job cummins Thanks.
     
  • Comment #42 (Posted by Jim Larsen)
    Rating
    The info helped me to better understand what is going on with the truck. I swapped out my 96 12 valve for this new engine without doing any research. So far I am very impressed with the new truck. Some of my concerns were what fuel mileage would be? Not as good. The power, and it is great. It looks as if there will be a problem with me doing much work on the truck because of all the computer tie ins. I'll now go back and reread the article again and make sure I fully understand everything.
     
  • Comment #43 (Posted by bh scott)
    Rating
    good article
     
  • Comment #44 (Posted by Harry)
    Rating
    Good article. I am all in favor of reducing the pollution and improving the operation. The new engine is so quiet I can drive up to people and talk with them without them realizing that I am driving a Diesel powered vehicle. Thanks for an excellent explanation.
     
  • Comment #45 (Posted by Keith)
    Rating
    My 2008 Dodge 2500 has 6500 miles. It's been in the shop three times as of this week. Engine Light, Engine Light, Engine Light. Told three times that I'm not driving this truck hard enough. Dealer just replaced two O2 sensors. Most driving has been at least two hour trips at 75 mph. I wish that I would have kept my 03 Cummins.
     
  • Comment #46 (Posted by Gene Coppinger)
    Rating
    I purchased a 2008 3500 Quad cab dually long bed. I now have better than 10000 miles on it, and pull wilh it most of the time. It pulls excellent, the throttle is a little strange but usable, the fuel milage has not improved. I get from 7 mpg to 13 mpg. Is there any hope for better fuel mileage, the price of fuel is bad. Any advise for better fuel milage. Thanks
     
  • Comment #47 (Posted by Lonnie Bond)
    Rating
    My 2007 2500 has been in shop 3 times for engine light, started just over 12000 mi. now has 15300 mi. Dealer said clogged turbo, truck has no power at all without turbo! Flashed it the first time, cleaned 2nd time, replaced turbo and dealer said exhuast was full of soot the 3rd. But still they have not addressed the emission sooting up problem waiting for engine light again! The not driving hard enough issue is rediculous unless someone whats to pick up the tickets!!!
     
  • Comment #48 (Posted by J Lindsey)
    Rating
    bought an 08 2500 4x4 quad cab 6.7 6spd.auto cause my father always had good luck with his 94 5.9 2x4 auto.He averaged 22-24 mpg with a K&N filter and an exhaust upgrade.I've only 850 miles on mine and didn't exspect to get as good as his but I'm only averaging 15. And from what I'm told,I'm lucky to be getting that.I'm also concerned to here about so many particulate filter issues.
     
  • Comment #49 (Posted by Lance)
    Rating
    Purchased a 2008 6.7L with the blue tech emission system. Check engine light comes on frequently regarding this system. At 17,000 miles entire catlayst system clogged and truck was in shop for two weeks. I'm sick that I bought this truck and I wish I had kept my older 5.9L.
     
  • Comment #50 (Posted by Glen Logan)
    Rating
    The article is very informative but I disagree with Cummins statement about the overall fuel economy being unchanged from the 2006 trucks. I know people who get combined economy better than 20 mpg with the previous 5.9 engines while the 6.7 struggles to average 15. This is a 25%+ decrease in fuel economy in a time of high fuel prices and a fuel shortage real or fabricated. I bought a 6.7 based on information like that above and have been disappointed with the truck. It has been in the shop for emission related problems once a month or more since I bought it. In 18000 miles it has had the turbo, 02 sensors and DPF replaced and been in for cleanings. I have the next visit to the dealership scheduled Monday for another P2000 code. Cummins/Dodge have covered all repairs under warranty but what is the cost of ownership going to be after the warranty runs out. I am told Cummins/Dodge are working hard to solve all these problems but the consumer needs to know these things before they go out and buy a truck based on the information above. I have also heard of people who have had no problems with their trucks but who also get no better than 15 mpg average.
     
Submit Comment