Future Pickup Trucks



Back Issue Index

 
  MAGAZINE
Purpose  
Sample Articles  
Magazine Index  
Subscribe/Renew  
Request Free Issue  
Gift Subscription  
Buy Back Issues  
Buy TDR Logo Items  
Advertising  
TDR Advertisers  
Membership Drive  

 
  ARTICLE CATEGORIES
 

News Archive

 
Search  


Advanced Search
 

 
Already a member?

Login here:
Username:
Password:
 

 

 »  Home  »  Blogs  »  Future Pickup Trucks
Ken Freund

I’ve always been crazy about anything with an engine.

After years of pestering my father, he finally let me drive a car - at nine years of age. At 14 I taught myself to drive stick shifts and then how to ride motorcycles. Later, I also learned to fly and have had my pilot’s license for 22 years. Working on, riding, driving, restoring, photographing and writing about all these wonderful machines has always been my passion. I've been an auto vo-tech and smog test instructor, certified master technician, vehicle inspector, shop foreman, service manager, service director, and shop owner. Over the years I’ve owned about 35 bikes and 50 cars and trucks, a lot of which I wish I had never sold!

 

View all blogs by Ken Freund...
Future Pickup Trucks
By Ken Freund | Published  10/12/2007

Pickup trucks, which are dear to our hearts, have seen a lot of changes over the years—or have they? Yes, the engines are more powerful, they can haul more weight faster, and they coddle their passengers with more amenities and electronic do-dads then ever before. But look at a Ford Model T pickup, and you’ll see the same basic layout, radiator and engine hood out front, followed by a cab and then a cargo bed.

Back in the '50s and ’60s several interesting designs were introduced, such as the Jeep FC-150 and 170 series, VW, Ford Econoline and Dodge A-100 van-based pickups, which all had their engine between driver and passenger, along with the rear-engine Corvair pickups.

These trucks, which are all defunct, provided exceptional packaging efficiency, fitting a lot in a short overall length. One of the tradeoffs was a reduced crush zone to protect the driver in a frontal crash. Since then there has been very little innovation in the basic pickup truck layout. However, today’s need to reduce fuel consumption, combined with increased urban congestion and parking problems, call for us to rethink the basic design of current and future pickups. Perhaps with current technology, including better seatbelts, airbags and computer-aided design, occupant protection in a flat-front pickup could be improved, like it is with the tiny Mercedes Smart car. The front could also slope backwards in an aerodynamic shape.

What do you think needs to be done, and what would you like the pickup truck of the future to be like?
Post a comment about this blog
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent
Add comment
Comments

  • Comment #1 (Posted by Morgan Long)

    I WILL be first in line for a Cummins-powered diesel-electric pickup truck. THAT"S RIGHT. No tranny, driveshaft, axle seals(!). Just raw torque and power through four high-torque electrics with built-in traction control, dynamic braking, shiftless acceleration (take that Nissan) and LONG, LONG mean time before failure!! Then I can step down on the controller and calmly burn the tread off all 4 tires!!!
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by R. Hoesly)

    not every one needs a 7000lb truck to drive around empty 90% of the time.I have 1981 4 wheel van magaizine full page ad tacoma diesel 31 city 38 hgy. whats wrong with that?we no longer have it.
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Bob Rees)

    What Morgan said.
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by John Kosik)

    Ken, I read and enjoyed your comments about truck designs of the past. I too remember the Ford, Dodge and VW "Cab Over" designs and liked them a lot. Current designers could learn a lot from some of the older designs, like the VW Rabbit Diesel. Wouldn't we love to have a basic commuter vehicle that delivered 50+ MPG (mine did)and didn't take a lap top computer to fix it?...........John Kosik
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by an unknown user)

    I think a modern version of the Chevrolet El Camino, Ford Ranchero, Plymouth Rampage, or VW Caddy is in order. What terrific go-getters these vehicles were! The current prices of the 20-year old VW Caddys attest to the brilliance of the concept. Keep it small and efficient and you'll find a market ripe for the picking.

    I think that more time and thought should be given to the bed area of the pickup. We need a stylish, yet practical flatbed. The next generation pickup should incorporate fold-down composite sides to expose a wide-open bed floor. Europe understands this practical feature. The 1-ton truck market is littered with flatbeds with folding sides. Trouble is, Detroit will tend to view these ideas as adding substantial cost increases over the standard two sides and a tailgate. American commercial customers will line up in droves with checkbooks in hand for a practical solution to the standard pickup bed, however.
     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by Jerry Strickland)

    Detroit is afarid of something really new. They don't really want to build something that will last for 10-20 years and million miles. If we want that we will have to pay class 10 comercial truck prices. Train engines and heavy mining trucks have had diesel to electric drive for years. It is a proven design that is super tough and durable. After market truck bed manufacturers have all kinds of super tough and pratical beds avaible for pickup trucks. But why won't Detroit learn?
     
  • Comment #7 (Posted by Frenchman)

    I like the trucks of the early fifties. The engine out front where you could work on all cylinders in the open. Of course the all the goodies would be nine and with the 8 foot bed.
     
  • Comment #8 (Posted by mike harris)

    my 2006 ram 2500 injector pump and injectors failed at 34000 miles and dodge will not waranty any of it after 4 dodge trucks that i have been happy with no help from dodge or cummins. guess its time for a power stroke.
     
  • Comment #9 (Posted by John)

    "not every one needs a 7000lb truck to drive around empty 90% of the time." Yes, that's why I hang on to my old 91 Dakota, 4 cyl engine, gets 31 mpg on highway, I don't need a tank I need another truck like this.
     
  • Submit Comment