Will High Technology Kill Our Love Of Trucks?



Back Issue Index

 
  MAGAZINE
Purpose  
Digital Magazines  
Sample Articles  
Magazine Index  
Ready To Travel  
Buyer's Guide  
Kevin Cameron's Collection  
Technical FAQ  
Dodge/Cummins History  
Dodge RAM TSB's 
Classified Ads 
Subscribe/Renew  
Request Free Issue  
Gift Subscription  
Buy Back Issues  
Buy TDR Logo Items  
Advertising  
TDR Advertisers  
Membership Drive  

 
  ARTICLE CATEGORIES
 

News Archive

 
Search  


Advanced Search
 

 
Already a member?

Login here:
Username:
Password:
 

 


 »  Home  »  Blogs  »  Will High Technology Kill Our Love Of Trucks?
Ken Freund

I’ve always been crazy about anything with an engine.

After years of pestering my father, he finally let me drive a car - at nine years of age. At 14 I taught myself to drive stick shifts and then how to ride motorcycles. Later, I also learned to fly and have had my pilot’s license for 22 years. Working on, riding, driving, restoring, photographing and writing about all these wonderful machines has always been my passion. I've been an auto vo-tech and smog test instructor, certified master technician, vehicle inspector, shop foreman, service manager, service director, and shop owner. Over the years I’ve owned about 35 bikes and 50 cars and trucks, a lot of which I wish I had never sold!

 

View all blogs by Ken Freund...
Will High Technology Kill Our Love Of Trucks?
By Ken Freund | Published  07/30/2007
Vehicle owners often develop a strong bond with their vehicles, and the TDR is a great example of this phenomenon. One of the things that seems to draw owners affection is the “character” or personality” of a vehicle, be it car or truck, motorcycle or boat or airplane. Simplicity often appears to be a factor, where the user can really understand how it operates and feel the experience with direct inputs and feedback. For example, owners love Model T Fords, VW bugs, Piper Cubs, vintage motorcycles and of course Dodge diesel pickups.

Creature comforts and amenities can be nice, but are we in danger of being overwhelmed by them, to the detriment of our bonding with the vehicle? Technology is making our vehicles more and more complex, and changing how we use them.

Drive-by-wire, automatic braking, self-parking, remote starting, etc. already exist. Future vehicles will be even more packed with high-tech communication and entertainment devices and gadgets. Soon, cars and trucks will communicate with each other and automatically download road information to help avoid collisions and traffic jams. This technology will eliminate much of the driver’s need to focus on the road and interact with the vehicle. In fact, vehicles which drive themselves are expected to be common in the United States within 30 years. But while our vehicles control themselves more and more, there is a potential that owners will lose the love of driving and working on them. It seems like we’re headed for a future where sealed hoods and impossibly complicated systems will have us driving around like zombies talking to each other on cell phones, and not having a clue about our vehicles. Hmmm, maybe we’re almost there already….

What do you think about this?
Post a comment about this blog
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent
Add comment
Comments

  • Comment #1 (Posted by TJF)

    My truck is an '05 so I don't feel that disconnected feeling. Even the throttle by wire is dialed in reasonably well, so other than not being able to lock out overdrive, which I would REALLY like to be able to do, I have learned to predict what the truck will do in most circumstances and can drive around some of the idiosyncrasies. In almost every other computer controlled, electronics laden vehicle I have owned that was unfortunately not the case. I quickly come to dislike, and in some cases despise vehicles where the responses are non-linear and/or unpredictable. There has been a whole list of these, but since this is a Mopar-centric site I'll pick on my wife's Charger SXT with the 3.5 V-6 and 5 speed auto. The throttle by wire is atrocious. It is nearly impossible to drive smoothly in a low speed situation, like parking or maneuvering in a tight spot. As you gingerly tip into the throttle there is no response at all at first, then after a miniscule bit more it come on abruptly and unpredictably. Then there is the schizophrenic transmission. Whoever developed the shift strategy for this thing needs to find a new career... maybe designing manure spreaders. It is always in the wrong gear and hunts, and hunts, and hunts. The car is also geared too tall and this makes matters worse. Additionally, I am aware of the computer continuously fiddling with the torque converter variable slip. Extremely annoying. The net result is a car that I will only drive if I have to, and that gets poor fuel economy to boot, which was the reason we chose the 3.5 over the Hemi. I understand the reason for electronics, and can appreciate the advertised power that can be developed while still meeting the emissions standards, but when they are poorly engineered it destroys the driving experience for people who are "connected" enough to tell the difference. I have always been a motorhead, but as I keep having negative experiences, I am losing interest.
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by Bill)

    I'm afraid I have to agree with you Ken. Technology has reached the point the average guy can't work on his truck. I still love my truck, but it's not like a 50's or 60's truck. Shoot you could have the head(s) off in a matter of minutes, tune a carb, adjust valves, might as well these days just drive/tow it to the shop and spend$$$$
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Dick Gabler)

    I too think that things are getting a little out of hand. When a vehicle begins to "drive itself" in some way, it will be difficult to "connect" with as we have done in the past when we could simply follow the mechanical path of most functions in our heads (and trouble shoot accordingly). I don't mind electronics if we could get to the programming details and follow the logic as we could with the mechanical methods. For this to work, we need open source programming that the after-market would have access to so we could, for example, mix transmission and engine combinations and integrate them for correct operation as if they came out of the factory that way. Maybe the after-market has to dive into the electronics a little more to provide this sorely needed solution so we can have our love affair with motors and gears back again in the near future.
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by Edward D.Carberry)

    I am sorry about being so bitter about my 99 3500 but it was a factory lemon. I found it to be toooo technically complicated for chrysler and cummins mechanics. With the electronics that are and are slated to go into the vehicles 25% of vehicles cost. I would like to see more options that give the driver the opportunity to enable or disable them.Things like dash lights and internal noise chimes.
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by Phil)

    The 6.7 is a wonderful vehicle. Its the EPA that has taken our choices away. Not technology.
     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by Forrest Nearing)

    I've always been a hot rodder. I am on my 5th 12v Cummins, and I contend they are the last 'true' hot rod. Purely mechanical... amazing that something as late as 1998 would be NON computer controlled. I think I'm about to take a step farther back and buy an old 1st gen. I look at the new offerings, and they're nice trucks and all, but they really lack the soul of an old 12v truck.
     
  • Comment #7 (Posted by JAMES GOMEZ)

    FORREST YOU ARE RIGHT, I HAD A 1995 1 TON DUALLY 12 VALVE VERY EASY ENGINE TO WORK ON AND UP GRADES FOR THIS MECHANICAL TYPE ENGINE WAS AMAZING ON HORSEPOWER AND TORQUE IT PUT OUT, WITH NO SENSORS OR HIGHLY SOPHISTICATED EQUIPMENT TO DEAL WITH.
    I SOLD THAT TRUCK TO MY BROTHER WITH 216,0000 MILES AND HE LOVES THAT RIG.I RECENTLY PURCHASED A 2007 5.9 LITER CUMMINS MEGA CAB DUALLY, IT'S NICE BUT I'M WONDERING IF DOWN THE ROAD WHEN PROBLEMS START ARISING IF I WILL REGRET TO HAVE SOLD THE OLD RAM FOR NEW DRIVING COMPUTER.
     
  • Submit Comment