Traffic: How much worse can it get?



Back Issue Index

 
  MAGAZINE
Purpose  
Digital Magazines  
Sample Articles  
Magazine Index  
Buyer's Guide  
Dodge/Cummins History  
Dodge RAM TSB's 
Subscribe/Renew  
Request Free Issue  
Gift Subscription  
Buy Back Issues  
Buy TDR Logo Items  
Advertising  
TDR Advertisers  
Membership Drive  

 
  ARTICLE CATEGORIES
 

News Archive

 
Search  


Advanced Search
 

 
Already a member?

Login here:
Username:
Password:
 

 

 »  Home  »  Blogs  »  Traffic: How much worse can it get?
Ken Freund

I’ve always been crazy about anything with an engine.

After years of pestering my father, he finally let me drive a car - at nine years of age. At 14 I taught myself to drive stick shifts and then how to ride motorcycles. Later, I also learned to fly and have had my pilot’s license for 22 years. Working on, riding, driving, restoring, photographing and writing about all these wonderful machines has always been my passion. I've been an auto vo-tech and smog test instructor, certified master technician, vehicle inspector, shop foreman, service manager, service director, and shop owner. Over the years I’ve owned about 35 bikes and 50 cars and trucks, a lot of which I wish I had never sold!

 

View all blogs by Ken Freund...
Traffic: How much worse can it get?
By Ken Freund | Published  09/25/2007
I just read that the average American driver wastes nearly an entire work week each year sitting in traffic while commuting. Collectively, we sat in traffic jams for a total of 4.2 billion hours in 2005, up from 4 billion the year before according to Texas Traffic Institute's urban mobility report. That works out to an average of around 38 hours per driver.

TTI’s study (http://mobility.tamu.edu) estimated that we wasted 2.9 billion gallons of fuel while stuck in that traffic. Adding up the lost time, traffic delays cost the nation $78.2 billion, the study also estimated. I’m sure that doesn’t include the missed meetings, missed flights and missed business opportunities, nor the stress and road rage it caused.

High fuel costs seem to have cut non-essential driving, but not commuting. According to census data about three-quarters of all commuters drive alone. Los Angeles had the worst congestion, delaying drivers an average of 72 hours last year, followed by Atlanta, San Francisco, Washington D.C. and Dallas.
Atlanta, which has the second-worst traffic in the U.S., had some surprising improvement. In 2005, drivers there wasted an average of 60 hours in traffic, down from 70 hours a decade prior. However, the population is growing so fast that planners are having a tough time dealing with the increase in traffic. Atlanta gained 890,000 people from 2000 to 2006, more than any other area in the country.

The study, which summed it up as "Too many people, too many trips over too short of a time period on a system that is too small," offers ways to reduce traffic congestion, including more roads or lanes, better public transportation and flexible work schedules, telecommuting and carpools. It seems like the way things are going, there’s going to be coast-to-coast gridlock.

What do you think needs to happen, and how can it be reasonably achieved?
Post a comment about this blog
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent
Add comment
Comments

  • Comment #1 (Posted by Morgan)

    and that coast to coast gridlock is courtesy of a half-witted highway engineer putting a light in a rotary. In Mass we are sadly the poster-children for bad roads - and these are new constructions. One lane becomes two through an intersection to become…ONE lane?! Merge lanes that wouldn't allow a guided missile room to merge. Construction areas where the sign indicates a lane lost and 5 lanes dissappear. And we wonder why we are left sitting?? Add too little BRAINS to too many people, too many trips, etc. I think we need to let our 5th graders design our highways—no way they could do worse. If you really wanted to move traffic - communicate a PLAN!! We're drivers, we're not stupid.

     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by AKaiser)

    Poor transportation planning: by the time the upgrade is complete, it's insufficient to handle the current load. Apparently, they're planning for average loads, and not peak loads ten years or more in the future.

    The other option, which is politically impractical now, but as fuel prices continue to rise, may be doable, is to intentionally let urban transportation get like the Dan Ryan in Chicago, forcing people to take public transportation if they want to get anywhere cheap. This works in places like downtown Chicago, as parking is at a premium (both cost and availability). It's more difficult in places like Indy, where parking isn't a huge problem, since downtown is mostly business, and there's not that great population density due to lack of multistory multi-occupancy housing. Indy's basically like a huge suburb with a small downtown.
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Bill S)

    Get out of the big metro areas and it's not a bleak as you might think.

    Higher fuel prices, and they are coming, may do more to encourage car pooling and riding public transportation and reduce the one person per car commute than anything else.

    I live about 120 miles east of the Dallas metro area. There aren't the traffic gridlock problems or the other big city problems here. One may make a little less working here, but the cost of living is less and we enjoy a much more relaxed lifestyle. There are thousands of towns like ours in the US if one gets out of the heavily populated areas.

    Bill


     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by George Johnson)

    Here in Oregon I believe we have less traffic lanes now than 15 years ago.Not only have we not built any new roads we've turned four lane roads into two lanes with a middle (left turn lane) and widened two lane roads and put in bike lanes which are poorly used.There is a town called Dundee which handles most traffic from the Portland area on the way to the coast, two lanes with a stoplight in town. There is at least a two to three miles trafficjam on the weekends somestimes worse.ODOT has been "studying" this problem since I moved here in 1973 and has recently floated a fix.They're wanting to have an Austrailian company build a toll road around the town and the town mayor then want to make the road through town a toll road also!I've never lived in a state more hostile to motor vehicle traffic!
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by Tracy)

    Traffic conditions continue to worsen all around the nation, and there is little that can be done about a growing population in a country limited by a finite number of roads, most of whom must or choose to take to the roads. However, I'm a firm believer that the most effective action that we can take as a country would be to create and enforce strict left-lane laws. Look at the front of each "moving jam" you get into, and you'll see some idiot at the front of the line in the left lane driving at or below the speed limit. Think of roads as blood vessels - blockage creates higher pressure. I say levy heavy fines against the idiots, and watch the traffic situation quickly improve.
     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by Jack)

    Ride more motorcycles and allow lane sharing like in California and all over Europe. Traffic congestion can be eased a bit. I commuted through Los Angeles for 24 years on motorcycles, congestion didn't bother me for the most part. I drive my CTD when the weather is bad.
     
  • Comment #7 (Posted by Wayne)

    For the normal commute in big cities, leave the POV at home and take the rail if it's in place. Inconvienent, yes but practical. After being stationed in Japan for 4 years, their rail system is an excellent way to get around. It'll cost us more for the infastructure(where's spell check when you need it) but overall I think it's the best thing we could do.
     
  • Comment #8 (Posted by yerock)

    I don't think that places like Houston with it being so spread out are doing much to fix the problem. they aren't thing of any type of rail system to carry people to the down town area. along a stretch of I-10 west they are redoing it all. at one time there was an old railway there gone now.. why not since they are redoing it all put in a system to the outer limits like say in california's BART............
     
  • Comment #9 (Posted by Kent)

    I drive an 18 wheeler and don’t under stand the logic of cities that don’t allow trucks in the left lane. I would think that they would want them away from the cars because most of the time trucks are just passing through the town, if the left lane was for big trucks only then the cars wouldn’t be dodging in between them diving for an exit causing trucks to slow down causing more of a backup. I think it would reduce car truck accidents and improve the flow of traffic through towns.
     
  • Submit Comment