View Single Post

Old 08-07-2008, 11:55 PM   #11 (permalink)
Gary - K7GLD
Offline
 
Gary - K7GLD's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Canyon City Oregon
Posts: 10,223
WELL, it's both interesting, and discouraging at the same time!

ON the one hand, we have all the Physicists and Scientists quoting textbook equations and "laws", and telling us what we are seeing and experiencing is "scientifically impossible" - even as we see guys we know, with absolutely NOTHING to gain by lying, run these setups and GETTING those "impossible" MPG improvements. I know for certain that when *I* try stuff, and it has problems or doesn't work, I spread the word to the best of my ability - am I really to assume others are less candid and honest? To what purpose?

I'd LOVE to try one of these setups myself, but I drive so little on the longer distance trips, that a meaningful test on the short term isn't likely, and it would be the Thanksgiving/Christmas Holidays before such a longer run would be made. And yeah, even if it was quite successful - I'd then have all those same textbook experts telling me that what I experienced wasn't real or possible - and I was most certainly mistaken - must have driven lots differently, or had an unusually potent tank of diesel fuel running along with the HHO...
__________________
'02 Quad cab, NV5600, GAUGES! LUK Cerametallic, Comp, Walbro, Rip's 4 in., Don M's 1.6's, DTT SS Intake, DSS steering stabilizer, Frantz oil/fuel filters, Amsoil Nanofiber air filter, 418 HP/978 TQ.

Californian by birth - Oregonian by CHOICE!
Reply With Quote