If you don't wish to see these ads, that is one of the many benefits of TDR membership. To receive a free copy of the TDR magazine and find out more information about membership benefits click HERE.



  
Go Back   TDR Roundtable > RAM: The Third Generation - 3G (2003 - 2009) > 5.9L Engine and Transmissions (2003-2007)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

ATS manifold observations w/ HTB2
Old 04-10-2005, 07:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
Offline
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Elko, NV
Posts: 1,041
Photo Gallery
Old Reader's Rigs Gallery
ATS manifold observations w/ HTB2

Here are my observations with using an ATS manifold with an aftermarket turbo. Take them for what they're worth!

In early January 2005 I installed an HTB2/62/12 turbo, but I kept the stock manifold. This was despite all the good advice from numerous members to do the manifold and turbo at the same time . These are the before observations:

-The pyro tap on the stock manifold was right before the turbo flange measuring the back 2 cylinders.
-With the stock manifold and the TST/VA stack I could peg the boost gauge pretty darn (scary!) quick up to 45 psi.
-I wouldn't see the EGT get higher than +/-1250*, especially getting on the peddle at low boost and ~2000-2200 rpm, and then the EGT would settle at about +/-1100* at WOT.

Last week I finally installed an ATS manifold and these are my after observations:

-I installed the pyro tap on the ATS manifold right before the turbo flange measuring the back 3 cylinders.
-With the ATS and the TST/VA stack at the same levels used as above, the boost comes on a lot smoother. It's still quick, but not blink of the eye quick like before. Max boost was 42 psi.
-The max EGT would hit +/- 1400*, especially getting on the peddle at low boost and ~2000-2200 rpm, and then the EGT would settle out to about +/- 1050* at WOT.

What's interesting is that:

-the EGT at the same measuring point peaks higher (during low boost fueling at ~2000-2200 rpm), but settles out about 50* lower. Is this because the hot exhaust gasses are now more in the manifold rather than backed up near the cylinders?? Larger diameter exhaust runners should equal slower exhaust flow...so then that would explain that...
-the boost spike is about 3 psi less indicating a more balanced flow to the turbo.

Edit: These observations are not towing. I would imagine that towing one would see better EGT numbers due to truck working harder and generating more boost?
__________________
03 2500 4x4, HO, 6spd, ARP, PDR cam, HD springs, Relentless dual CP3, SBC 3600DD, MPI Super B/GTX4202R twins, Flux 2, TST R49, TNT/R, ISSPRO, 2 micron fuel system.

Last edited by JStieger; 04-10-2005 at 07:49 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


  
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0