Please note:

The opinions given in the political forum do not necessarily reflect those of the owners and management of the Turbo Diesel Register. This forum exists to keep political discussions out of the regular forum so that you do not have to read them unless you choose to. If you got here via a search or “view new posts” and do not wish to see political posts in those searches in the future please click here.

If you don't wish to see these ads, that is one of the many benefits of TDR membership. To receive a free copy of the TDR magazine and find out more information about membership benefits click HERE.



  
Go Back   TDR Roundtable > Other Topics > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

UN Issue/War Crime Shield for US Dropped by US
Old 06-23-2004, 06:11 PM   #1 (permalink)
Offline
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Iowa
Posts: 222
UN Issue/War Crime Shield for US Dropped by US

What do you guys think of this?
Has been an issue against this for a long time by the US regarding US troops in other countries.
-Maybe recent issues with foreign "prisoners" being held by US have finally made it an issue?
-Wonder how the US troops feel about being ordered to be in an overseas action, and then held accountable to whatever government is in power or will be in power. Or maybe even a third party action by another regime that has an agenda?

Lots of possibilities!!! Maybe some innocent US personnel (bet it will not be high level either!!) is going to suffer, when all he did was defend himself/others cause not everyone has our values about life etc.



U.S. Drops U.N. Bid for War Crime Shield

Associated Press/AP Online


UNITED NATIONS - Facing strong opposition, the United States announced Wednesday it was dropping a resolution seeking to renew the exemption for American peacekeepers from international prosecution for war crimes.

U.S. deputy ambassador James Cunningham made the announcement after key Security Council members rejected a U.S. compromise proposal to limit the exemption to one final year.

"The United States has decided not to proceed further with consideration and action on the draft at this time in order to avoid a prolonged and divisive debate," Cunningham said after a closed council meeting.

Before the meeting, Spain and China said they would abstain if the resolution was put to a vote, and Philippines Ambassador Lauro Baja, the current council president, said he doubted the United States had the minimum nine "yes" votes needed to adopt it.
__________________
Jim
IA. Finally!
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


  
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0