Global Warming Scam debunked,read this to know»
The Global Warming Scam through Kyoto Protocols is design to fleece one country, America.
The science behind the Global Warming Scam is junk, they have for years now
ignored Trillions of tons of H2O and concentrated on a few Billion tons of CO2. Duh!
And a 1 degree rise in global temperature inaccurately measured does not a trend make.
At the very least we should include the general warming trend the earth
has been going through for the last 20,000 years, can you say 'ice age melting'.
Global Warming-A Chilling Perspective:
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/ic...#anchor2108263
Green Myths On Global Warming Debunked:
http://www.abd.org.uk/green_myths.htm
Climate models are programmed with excessive climate sensitivity based on a flawed understanding of past ice ages:
http://www.junkscience.com/
Renowned Scientist Defects From Belief in Global Warming - Caps a Year of Vindication for Skeptics:
http://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=264777
Michael Crichton doesn't believe in The Global Warming Scam should you:
http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=16260
A prime piece of evidence linking human activity to climate change turns out to be an artifact of poor mathematics:
http://www.technologyreview.com/read...3830&ch=energy
Essay Claiming 'Scientific Consensus' for Global Warming is Ridiculed:
Global Warming alarmists saturate the internet with bogus science reports
then claim the majority of opinion is "Global Warming is real".
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.as...20041207a.html
Water Vapor Rules the Greenhouse System:
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html
Water Vapor is the most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere:
http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/gases.html#wv
Understanding atmospheric water vapor's role in increasing clouds thereby global cooling:
http://www.espere.net/Unitedkingdom/...tervapour.html
The Water Vapor Skeptics argue:
Clouds currently are believed to have a small net cooling effect. The effect they will have in the future is uncertain. The interactions among water vapor, clouds, aerosols, and radiation are far more complex than we have room to hint at here.
They claim:
The computer models generally used to simulate climate are not yet very helpful in understanding clouds, because clouds are much smaller than the finest detail the models can represent.
But these same incomplete computer models are use to warn us of global warming impending doom:
http://www.nsc.org/EHC/climate/ccucla6.htm
The Carbon Cycle and Earth's Climate:
How the Earth can add and remove CO2 on it's own:
http://www.columbia.edu/~vjd1/carbon.htm
GLOBAL GARDEN GROWS GREENER:
A NASA-Department of Energy jointly funded study concludes Earth has been greening over the past 20 years:
Climatic changes, over approximately the past 20 years, tended to be in the direction of easing climatic limits to plant growth. In general, in areas where temperatures restricted plant growth, it became warmer; where sunlight was needed, clouds dissipated; and where it was too dry, it rained more. In the Amazon, plant growth was limited by sun blocking cloud cover, but the skies have become less cloudy. In India, where a billion people depend on rain, the monsoon was more dependable in the 1990s than in the 1980s.
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/...arthgreen.html
The Net Primary Productivity Response of Earth's Temperate Forests to Atmospheric CO2 Enrichment:
How increased greening becomes a net remover of CO2:
http://www.co2science.org/scripts/CO...9/N28/EDIT.jsp
What is Net Primary Productivity (NPP)?
http://ccrs.nrcan.gc.ca/optic/coarse/beps/npp_e.php
Globally, terrestrial ecosystems are calculated to have been a net sink
to the atmosphere during the 1990s:
http://www.whrc.org/carbon/missingc.htm
Carbon stored in trees and soils is released to the atmosphere when forests are cleared and cultivated. Some of the release occurs rapidly with burning; some of it occurs slowly as dead plant material decomposes. When forests regrow on cleared land, they withdraw carbon from the atmosphere and store it again in trees and soils.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...rbonsinks.html
Carbon Sink Skeptics now believe:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...rbonsinks.html
Rain helps carbon sink:
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/CarbonHydrology/
Radical environmentalcases don't want Kyoto to include carbon sinks:
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/twr125d.htm
http://www.fpif.org/papers/kyoto.html
Linear Mode
