National Debate Champions Win Without Debating Actual Topic

[Mike Ellis]

Incredible. Simply incredible. How can these guys have been construed as winning? Has everyone in the entire nationwide academic community been completely blinded by PC?

Towson U. debaters take national championship
First African-American duo to win title are grads of city high schools

By Nick Madigan | Sun reporter
March 26, 2008

Dayvon Love and Deven Cooper don't object to being called argumentative. They thrive on it.

The two members of Towson University's debate team happily accepted congratulations yesterday after winning a national championship -- the Cross Examination Debate Association's five-day tournament in Wichita, Kan. -- and making history by being the first African-Americans to do so.

Cooper, who turned 22 yesterday, and Love, 20, emerged victorious Monday night from a field of more than 180 two-person teams in the tournament, during which they overcame top-seeded debaters from Missouri State University, the University of Northern Iowa and elsewhere. In the final round, Love and Cooper beat a team from the University of Kansas by a decisive score of 7-4.

"We didn't really expect to win it," Cooper, a graduate of Lake Clifton High School in Baltimore, said yesterday while traveling to Fullerton, Calif., for another tournament this weekend. Asked how they had celebrated, he said, "We went to IHOP."

But what made the duo's achievement not only remarkable but groundbreaking was that they had turned debate traditions upside down deciding not to argue their chosen topic -- whether the United States "should constructively engage with a Middle East country." Instead, in a direct challenge to the judges and the system under which they operate, the pair made their central premise the notion that, as Cooper said, "the problems of exclusion in the debate community need to be addressed first."

By that, Cooper said, he meant the "racism, sexism and homophobia" that pervade the kind of tournament at which they were speaking. "We have a responsibility to talk about these things," he said. "We talk about racism the most because it's the one we're most affected by. Even at awards banquets, they make jokes that the community laughs at, but the people who they affect don't laugh."

In addition, Cooper and Love used various forms of expression, including hip-hop, clips of songs and "spoken word," to accentuate their points, a far cry from the more straightforward, evidence-laden presentations of some of their competitors.

"They debate in a style that is definitely outside the conventions of most teams," said Darren Elliott, president of the Cross Examination Debate Association, which oversees policy debate competitions for two- and four-year colleges in the country. "It's a very nontraditional style. That was clearly their strength."

(snip)

So people can "win" a "debate" by not even arguing the TOPIC at hand? Boy that explains a lot of the discussion on the TDR politics forum...